Why You Should Poll For National In 2023
What if most choices were National anyway?
Before I got into activism, policy, and politics, life was good. I was disorganised and deeply ideological, but at least I was productive and not out there forcing my flawed utopian agendas on everyone else. Like most sane people, I was testing them out in my own space. What were my ideologies? I think that humans should pursue symbiosis with our surroundings. I know that with great power comes great responsibility, and I know that we should promote that, by being examples of responsibility that wields power wisely. The wisest being the ones that sheath it. In short, be better at doing a passionate and unique iteration of Māui every day. Who doesn’t believe that? The ones that won’t watch or read allegorical stories to find deep moral lessons. Through those who don’t like allegories, we get the delusion of self-destructive and contradictory psychology; Enlightened absolutists and their unconstitutional governments.
Before I unwittingly played a flawed version of New Zealand’s William Wallace, I was a practising multi-skilled tradesman with a passion for merging aesthetic landscapes with productive growing models and structures. I was also into automation and wanted to create proof-of-concept production models that relied on sunlight and indoor LEDs. I wanted to create sufficiently automated regenerative economic models, document their success and pitfalls, and create business plans and operation plans so others could implement them for themselves. Through this, I hoped that these models would generate tangible increases in our GDP through time-efficient input. That way, people who lived around conservation estates could earn well and be locally-based trust guardians of areas that needed constant mammal predation.
That was part of my working solution to the loss of our native biodiversity, lack of homes, and struggling rural economies. I was doing that until the government intervened with their dumping of a toxic waste-based economic model.
Predator Free was implemented by the last National government, but because I continue to learn how the Crown works; I know that National was just the marketing flavour of the time. A flavour that generally intervenes in the lives of people less than the intense social-engineering option. Predator Free was a stupid endeavour that implied that wiping out the solution to biodiversity loss would solve biodiversity loss. After all, if you want your solution to be consistent with the goal, the branding should be consistent too, right? The right predators are the solution to our biodiversity problem, this isn’t a belief, I know this to be true because it worked in Yellowstone Park. Considered advancement and strategic placement of advanced human predators will add to the conservative halo around the ngahere and create synergetic solutions to other societal problems too.
In a naive rush to stop the Russell Forest 1080 drop, I changed from being the change we needed in this country, into someone who tries to convince absolutists to stop being the problem that claims to be the solution. Did it work? No, and the decision to commit to this contest against the Crown has been the bain of my family’s life. Yet, as I would learn after six years of intense struggle, trying this wasn’t about successfully convincing them; it was about improving my ability to get my thoughts across to people who are willing to listen. How to do that best? Practice on those who only pretend to listen because they’re more concerned about acting nice than being kind. An attempt to turn the obtuse into a sharpener of my constitution, a sharpening of the spirit through taking on the dark.
All that is over now, I am done doing it in this counter-productive way.
Many would claim that I stuck with this activist and social media stuff for this long because of my ego. Those are the types of things people say when they don’t know me, but want me to be the character they’ve created in their head for the hypothetical benefit of their ego. It’s called projection. I have an ego, I’m not someone who thinks that a well-maintained mask of nicety is a sign of not having an ego. If you are here in the realm of limitation with me, then you have an ego too. The question is; who’s being ruled by it? Me or you? The ego is the thing we have to learn to reconcile with, it can keep us stagnated, fighting the same problem with the same failed approach or it can teach your light to shine brighter every day.
Ego can be direct, fierce, ignorant or passive-aggressive, fake, and manipulative, which one are you? No, I stayed in the realm of activism until I had learned all I needed to know. So when I went back to what I love doing, building solutions; I would know how to communicate those solutions to those who want to listen. Talking to people who don’t want to listen is pointless if you can’t get repetition of sense through to them.
Those who wield victimhood like a weapon don’t listen to people like me.
National will rule over persons after this election, there’s no denying that. It’s a hyper-organised party that works for currency printers who have a monopoly on manipulation. This corporate organisation of absolutism can create convincing divisive masks of our values, placing them on the faces of policy opticians whenever you start to push back against their flawed absolutism. To make it more complex, the system is rigged against men and women who can’t get together in large collectives and organise themselves toward lawful competence. Even if you could get into a large enough collective, register your party, and popularise a movement against coercive 21st-century tyrants; they’ll rig the system to make sure you don’t get in. Why? Because we haven’t earned it yet. That’s the most important lesson I have learned. How am I learning it? Through intense censorship, constant failure, and my unwavering persistence and patience to seek the truth.
Many on both sides may hate me for doing my best to tell everyone the truth, even when I know some will hate me for telling them. Yet, that’s who I am, and that’s who I will continue to be, I’ve just realised it’s pointless telling those who are religiously committed to identifying as the public. Sadly, many can’t hear it, it’s not that they’re not worthy, they could be, but they’re not ready. Trying to force it onto people is not too dissimilar to intense social engineering for hypothetical environmental benefit. Some mindsets should not know the way through loopholes that exist in our unconstitutional legal system. The Corporate Globalist’s knowledge of these loopholes is how they’ve gotten away with so much already.
lie dam
Lying in the short-term to hypothetically benefit the pursuit of paradise has put us on the blind, deaf, and dumb path to hell, and sadly, that’s all the public sees as sense. There are already enough who have committed to that contradiction of being and I don’t want to join them in the mire, but I do have to learn how not to cast pearls before swine. As that has done nothing to solve the problem either. I know a bit about problem-solving, I used to solve problems before I started working with people who oppose problem creators. If there’s anything I’ve learned observing opposition-to-problem-creation, it’s this; they don’t solve problems either. In fact, they are future problem creators because they don’t dedicate enough energy to solution creation.
None of the minnow parties has the combined competence, organisation, creativity, principled approach, consistency, or cohesion to overcome and fix the foundationally corrupt Corporate State. Even if one of them had the qualities required, everyone seeking that party would be confused by the dilution of options, that they divide their polls amongst thirteen derivatives of that solution. As this is a popularity contest, not a competency test, some will pick the most popular one on social media. Some will choose the most popular one on television and internet polls. Some who are bitter about the use of Sun Tzu's warfare tactics will dig their heels in, and ruin the chances of the most competent conservative “handbrake”. All of which will do nothing substantial to convince self-destructive dogma to stop.
I know many know that, yet still won’t believe that, and will still poll for any one of the minnows without doing their due diligence. If you were doing your due diligence you would be learning to deregister from the electoral commission while building your part of a new lawful confederation of societies. After all, so many have understandably lost faith in the Crown to solve the problems it creates. That’s why so many tend to poll for those who have not or do not work for it. Yet, that shouldn’t matter if this maxim is used competently.
Dolo malo pactum se non servabit. A pact made with evil intent will not be upheld. This maxim is sometimes written Dolo malo pactum se non servaturum (meaning “an agreement induced by fraud will not stand”).
NZLoyal is a party that is trending in a similar direction to the divisive Advance NZ party. Thanks to Liz Gunn’s superior communication skills and heart-string-tugging expertise, no one has noticed how identical this failed approach is to Jami-Lee Ross and Billy Te Kahika’s vote-dividing campaign. A campaign that was set up by people connected to the National Party, in preparation for an obvious changing of the marketing guard in 2023. If NZLoyal’s supporters had as much instinct and mental sense as they have heart, they would know that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again whilst expecting different results.
The problem with fence-sitting to avoid the political ire of the mob is that those who want it said how it is will abandon you for the incompetent that says it how it is. This might be a problem if they go to competent Conservative parties who are sick of lies being used to hypothetically benefit the pursuit of truth. How to prevent that? Popularise incompetent alternative options that implode once they’ve divided the poll. I don’t do internal subversion, I think it does more harm than good. Christopher Finlayson should know that the best offence is a perfect defence. Sadly, his reviling of traditional Conservatism and its populist form is a projection, he is a part of something that does the same thing.
Then there’s Freedoms NZ; an organisation that is already making the same mistakes as the National Party. A collection basket of people who think that inconsistency and lack of accountability are things that can be remedied through lack of accountability and inconsistency. I get that the COVID-19 Response was a difficult time and that people made mistakes, but I know plenty of people who didn’t make those mistakes and called it from the start. Why should we market you if you can’t be accountable to those who hold consistency in high regard? Maybe what you did was precautionary and strategic considering the sophistication of our opposition, but it wasn’t wise and at times like these, we shouldn’t settle for more National Party fence-sitting tactics.
Yet, reality sinks in and the weak of mind convince themselves that fence-sitting tactics are needed to keep the blind mob because you can’t do anything in a democracy without the blind mob. Especially if the blind mob’s population is growing thanks to the long-term shortening of attention spans.
Democracy NZ, a party that National hoped would divide New Zealand First’s vote share through Ronald King’s “anti-vaccine” and pro-good-cop virtue signals. Unfortunately, a party exodus undermined that move before it got going, and NZ First benefitted from the internal sabotage of Democracy NZ’s too-early momentum. Right after that political bomb went off, NZ First started trending upwards. That is until NZ Loyal managed to get registered in record time with no real hindrance. Even though, they only just got a Constitution out to justify people valuing them as a viable option at the polls. This is ironic because that’s the reason why several candidates left Democracy NZ. Lack of a robust Constitution that constrains them to the people. A standard incorporated society off-branch of the National Party, because it is a “good political strategy” to be anti-coercion in other companies people don’t know you own, while being “pro-honourable” coercion toward the mob.
Why the sarcasm? A Constitutional Government should not be colluding with those it claims to regulate so they can gain from the people’s loss. That is not a government, that is a criminal.
I don’t know for sure if all of these minnow parties are purposefully dividing the poll on behalf of National. If they are; you have to admire the brilliance and organisation required to implement such an approach. A reasonable excuse for doing this is obvious; incompetence that gets into Parliament through populism alone will make things worse for our national interests. Especially if this populism is paired with rank incompetence. Yet, the question remains, why is conservative populism popular? Is it because the neoliberalism establishment has been arrogantly and ignorantly incompetent? Are they now criminals of the highest order?
If the modus operandi for the minnow party division is to make sure that silent fence-sitting competence can make absolutist decisions without handbrakes and incompetence in the way. Then that doesn’t make sense, that’s absolutism made manifest and it needs checks and balances at the very least! It’s why we came up with trusts and constitutions that evolve with our ability to escape accountability. I know why I’m kept out of temporary Ponzi scheme “populist” campaigns, it’s because I’m too smart and too honest. To people who engage in actions that sacrifice the truth in the short-term to hypothetically benefit their truth in the long run, I’m naive, and maybe they’re right.
My life was better when we had a political marketing team that focused on marketing policies that waged war on those who relied on their entitlements. Sadly, so many of these people will be abandoned by the workers in the “Freedom and Truth” movement, they’ll be too busy making money. I’m not stupid. I know that this way of doing things results in guilt and we end up polling in someone who takes advantage of that guilt and uses it to wage war on those who commit to the unconscious life of the TIN man. There are thousands, potentially millions like me who are now aware of the contradictory cage cycle we have been put in for the hypothetical greater good. We realise that it’s not for the greater good at all, it’s for the preservation of a delusion that never stood up to reason. Yet, persisted because we are not ready to use reason to defeat it. Frankly, I wonder whether people are ready to hear it at all. Many of us want to persist with absolutist statements and biblical metaphors, metaphors we refuse to interpret for those indoctrinated by pseudo-reason because they need to figure it out for themselves. Yet, isn’t a mentor meant to help us do that more efficiently without stealing those psychological victories from the apprentice?
Isn’t that what good governance is supposed to do? Help citizens grow up into sovereigns? Are there more sovereign individuals or more slaves? Are there more of both? Is neoliberal statute slavery going too far? Is it creating more slaves and therefore, more slave problems? How can someone with a slave mindset solve existential problems if they are imprisoned in their slave mindset?
National will rule the minds of the public/slaves after this election, and if we’re stupid, we will allow all the smaller psychological buckets to divide us, and join them in the rollout of a plan that has already been decided on. After all, if multiple “different” psychologies agree with the direction, then it appears like the show you are watching is a real democracy. Look closer, it might be a collection of identical psychologies acting out “differences” to give you the impression that this is a democracy. That’s called democratia and it comes from old Roman theatre shows where their political person is the mask they wear on their face. The character; your person. In that situation, it might be more effective to just pick one political character so the illusion is less complex and deceiving.
Here’s an example; if you poll for ACT, you support the contradictory attitude of David Seymour, the attitude that disagrees with employee slavery over the workplace that isn’t in line with law, but agrees with employer slavery over the workplace that isn’t in line with law. If you poll for New Zealand First, you support an old clever handbrake that slows down the inevitable, until faith in it capitulates because of inconsistent moves that lack context because not enough of us are learning the law and the true nature of the Corporate State. If you poll for Te Pati Māori and the Greens, you’ll get the continued politics of envy and self-victimisation, something a depressed Nation doesn’t need right now. If you poll in the minnows, your poll will be divided amongst thirteen parties who are marketing policies that the National party supports on principle but won’t do unless it works with what the Crown has already signed up to.
That’s the rigged game, people talk about psy-ops as if the establishment parties are the only entities involved in the psy-op. Everything is a psychological operation. Politicians, Lawyers, Advertisers, and Preachers have gotten so clever these days, that any desire to get a mob of people moving or thinking in a certain direction is easily done through complex psychological operations. It’s called influencing. The only thing that should matter to you is the consistency of the goal they want you to move toward, and whether mentorship through full disclosure is being used to move you toward that goal. I was told at the Wellington Occupation, not to be a pawn, I thought about that advice for a long time and urged others to do the same. I do that because one man, woman, or group does not have all the answers. If it is the case that your political choices and political system are so well-rigged through complex unlawful manipulation, then why bother polling until you have a competent option that truly represents unmanipulated mentorship?
Sadly, you don’t have that. What you do have is a variety of options that are flawed beyond anything I have ever seen in the workforce. The place that solves problems. I think it’s insane to put as much energy as we all do into political solutions. I put over six years into it and all I got was guilt for realising too late, that I was involved in a political Ponzi scheme and frustration that I did it all at a cost to my financial stability and my family’s security. I told myself that I was doing it for the greater good, and in some ways that was true. I would not take back what I have gained in communication skills and experience, but I will not continue to promote fraud.
If you’re going to poll in this election, if you’re going to continue to engage with a system that already thinks it knows better than all of you and abuses you through concealing frauds, then say this; “fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. It doesn’t matter what you choose at the polling booth, a National party approach is what you're likely going to get. Want to know what that is? Think back to the nineties, we’d just been through a Rogernomics reset and people were forced out of the workplace for an ideological agenda. Once that was completed, it was time for Ruthanasia—a policy that would wage war on social services and those who rely on their entitlements.
That’s where the social credit system will start, millimetre by skilled millimetre. You’ll face cuts left, right, and centre and those who complain the loudest will be the ones who caused the need for that through gullible stupidity born out of resentment, selfishness, and illogical fear. Watch cash get silently shredded and odd offers of alternative tax structures paired with passport-compliant persons. A 1% financial transaction tax would be a good carrot for that. Biotech and poorly considered gene editing experimentation will be the silent catch. NZ First, NZLoyal, Freedoms NZ, Democracy NZ, New Zeal, or Leighton Baker might be a thorn in the side of those marching toward “progress” under the banner of enlightened absolutism. Yet, how effective they are at being a thorn or a handbrake depends on their size, consistency, competence, and cohesion. None of them want to band together properly, so none of them have any real dedication to stopping the march to oblivion.
If you can’t understand why someone did something look at the consequences and infer the motivation - Carl Gustav Jung.
If you think that polling in one of those options is going to “change the system” then you just don’t know enough and you aren’t thinking. You may as well poll for National because that’s where most of your votes will go if your chosen pipe dream doesn’t get in. That’s likely why there are so many options for you to choose from, and because they know your dogmatic ego so well, they know you won’t be able to change when the reality is right in front of your face. That’s why they tell you what they will do before they do it, they’re egotists, they know that your ego prevents you from coming to terms with the truth because they know that about themselves. The only ones who can exempt themselves are the ones brave enough to look deep into the abyss and still be brave enough to walk toward the light. When will you do that? When will you face reality? That the solution to all our problems is found in the problem, but only implemented outside of the problem.
For six years, people like me were the target of those who lived in resentment and shame. The parties that suit people who rely on them for beneficial pearls they may not earn. Unfortunately, they will be the target soon. I will still be there to help. Yet, truthfully, the government has already given you a way to avoid the next mandates. If you know someone who can write business and operation plans that you can set up at home, you could get up to $50,000, avoid the coming beneficiary mandates and be a part of the solution to inflation. Volunteerism will be used as an excuse again to cover for more sophisticated force and coercion, and the activist and political response will be more incompetence, virtue signals, and lack of cohesion. No thanks, been there, done that. We should be becoming the change our land, air, and water needs by building competency, consistency, and cohesion and improving on it every day.
Why should you poll for National? Because your poll has a high chance of going there anyway, no matter which minnow party you choose. Is this Defeatism and apathy? No, but that’s what you have to conquer, and that requires competence, consistency and cohesion. That hasn’t been achieved in any of your minnow party options, and that’s why National will “win”. Yet, fear not, like I’ve said in this article; if you do your due diligence with law, produce GDP, and don’t publicly call them out for waging war on beneficiaries, they’ll leave you alone. What to do about the unconstrained Corporate State? That methodology is not found at the polls, but if you must, choose an option that has got its i’s dotted and t’s crossed and has a history of being an effective corporate hand brake. After all, if you’ve read this far, you’re playing the long game now.
Interesting viewpoint Brad, I agree we are going to get a National type government, one without much in the way of mercy or consideration. So I think that I would like to apply a hand brake. This is not a solution but may buy a bit more time, possibly. More time is only of use if we make good use of it.
Pretty accurate write up Brad, nicely done.