Why You Shouldn't Poll For The Minnow Parties In 2023

Because they won't become one party poll option to save me from writing articles in the double-digits, I'm only writing one.

This is not an article that will insist that the minnow party vote is a wasted vote. The masses flipping the table over is looking like a sane option at the moment. We’re watching a wholesale firestorm of industry, fake health crises, a blind, deaf, and dumb legal system, lasers from space, and no public executions for blatant purveyors of crimes against humanity. What’s next? Aliens? The lack of executions is something that I fondly attribute to the inherent meek nature of the disaffected masses. It means that we will inherit the world, we just have to rise up correctly, and we will.

This article isn’t a manipulative and disingenuous form of repetition that calls for “rational” consolidation in the face of tough times. I do see the rationale in that, but I also see the rationale in not polling in “shareholders” who may be contracted to the continuation of this madness. So far, it is my opinion that every individual who has been in that contract and confidentiality mess that is parliament; is a stupid vote. Sorry Cam Slater, but a stupid vote is worse than a “wasted” vote. Voting or polling in the establishment is stupid, but so is polling in an unprepared future employee of the establishment. Good luck getting that through to “free people” with slave mindsets who claim to be for truth and freedom.

Before I get into this combined critical evaluation of thirteen parties, a number sacred to the archetypes of destruction, let’s get some facts straight.

---

A video you can only watch on Bitchute, you must watch it if you are serious about addressing the actual problem. There are some inaccuracies in this and they are addressed therein, and I will address all of these in a later article.

---

You don’t have to vote or poll to get yourself out of tyranny. However, if you don’t know how to get yourself off the electoral roll and you don’t see yourself learning how before the election, then you may as well participate in the election theatre. There are clear electoral commission integrity issues so genuinely winning is a huge question mark. Yet, it is clear that a strong policy marketing candidate with proper legal protections can help the common people build resiliency against what’s coming. How? Popularizing our policies and our narratives. In order for us to choose who popularizes these well, we would all have to:

1. Know what’s coming in relation to the Geopolitical theatre.

2. Know what to do as countermoves to protect our people, land, air, and water, and how to monitor our election integrity through robust proof-gathering means.

3. Be capable of creating sound plans to implement those lawful countermoves and the alternative pathway forward.

For any nation or land of people suffering under demoralization, it’s important to get the words and presentation of re-moralization done correctly. It’s the only good reason we have policy opticians, to give competent policies good optics and use rhetoric to strengthen the morale of our people. The problem all politicians have is they are all concepts and very little content. The few that have good content are terrible at marketing it, and those who are excellent at marketing lack consistent content. The problem we have with politicians; is that they all market the policies of the ones who pay them, and right now, we can’t afford to pay them more than the ones who print fake money.

That’s why most of you who read my articles won’t be voting for the establishment. The problem all of you face is a lack of concept, content, and cohesion coming from those who seem to not be tied up in the establishment’s conflicts of interest. So, without further ado, let’s give you the reasons why you shouldn’t poll for your “white knights and dames”. Just so you know, it’s not easy to make an enemy out of all of your “allies” by being too honest. We should all be doing honour and truth justice if we truly want that which brings real freedom. Lest you doom those who do it to a metaphorical cross of martyrdom.

1. New Conservatives; these guys decided that trying to get in under one party was too hard. So now they are trying to get in under multiple Conservative parties. Wait what? Yeah, all the Conservatives are now spread out amongst seven parties! They can’t agree on what to do with what they don’t agree with; Neoliberalism. So they started with this party and divided themselves amongst seven Horcruxes like Voldemort did in Harry Potter. Except many of their constituents don’t allow their children to watch wizarding and witchy movies, and now there’s a division akin to a magical movie plot twist. Oh, the irony. It’s the same party, same policies, with a less engaging leader. There might be some super stealth strategy at play here that I’m not aware of, and I hope so, otherwise, Jamie-Lee Ross is right; they’re just stupid.

2. Aotearoa Legalize Cannabis Party is the only party that is a wasted vote. Why? Because it is cast by the wasted. Cannabis is legal, it’s just considered an “offence” to grow it without a license because a criminal entity and its “medicinal” accomplices say so. If you aren’t in a gang, using this natural medicine as a gateway for meth, then you have nothing to worry about. No one is coming for you. If they do, and it’s under Labour and the Greens, they’ll be “busting grow operations” in cahoots with you and Paddy Gower for a victimhood marketing campaign. If it’s under National, just chill, they’re not interested in your entrepreneurial endeavour so long as you cause no harm, injury, or loss, buy taxed things, and don’t call them out for waging war on beneficiaries and those who catch them playing psychopathic politics.

3. New Zeal Party; great leader, great imagery, a better logo, and the type of strong values people need in parliament. Too many people write off Christians because of their intense religious nature. The irony? We need genuine Christians and De-Facto Christians in parliament in their droves. Why? Because to wage war and exact revenge is diametrically opposed to their belief structure. If you want the war to stop, find genuine Christians by developing a passion for psycho-analytics and joining up with them. Sadly, thanks to thirty-nine years of ideological subversion, more people would rather have Starscream the transgender Decepticon in parliament than Christians. Which is absolutely batshit, but that’s the world we live in now. Want more irony? You can’t stand intense religion, and yet, every day you subscribe intensely to the religion of money and debt. Guess what got you into this mess? Religious dedication to the greedy accumulation of money and debt…

4. TOP; was created by Gareth Morgan and his flying monkey Geoff Simmons. Their purpose? To capture university students away from the Greens and proclaim that taxing housing will fix a housing unaffordability problem Germany doesn’t have. Why doesn’t Germany have a housing unaffordability problem? We can talk about the taxes they engage with, but ultimately it’s psychological culture. They’re more interested in individual daily passions than goals of owning houses and profiting off the never-ending pursuit of the dream home through real estate economics. Thanks to those passions they make a diverse range of their own quality stuff, and because of that, the world wants what Germany makes. That way, money-making isn’t focused on real estate, which would send a disproportionate amount of wealth just to that industry. Wait, isn’t our political history dominated by moves that would serve an unconscious real-estate mafia that thrives off endless inflation, endless development, and the periodic destruction of industry? Yep.

5. New Nation Party; is one of the few parties that have actually put real content and real remedies into their party’s marketing campaign. Read their Constitution, it’s quite robust. The problem? They have sub-par marketing skills, no connection with the youth, and an arrogance that puts off the ashamed masses. They have the same problem as I do, the problem is, they’re old. I’ve observed that teaching old dogs new tricks gets harder with age. Neoconservative types are averse to the unknown and will doggedly commit to the known, even if it contradicts new knowns. That’s why they really need to figure out what defines a good Liberal. Creativity is not their strong suit, and that is what is tripping up the Masculine/Conservative, lack of creativity and growth.

6. Vision NZ; the manifestation of Hannah Tamaki’s political dreams. The woman who is steering the growing Destiny Empire. How do we know she is steering it? Who do you think rules the house these days? Who do you think rules my house? Me? Get real… When you see victimhood-based responses coming from Brian in response to relevant critique from Samantha Edwards and Counterspin. You cannot say that was a Masculine response. Real men don’t respond like that, we respond by rebutting points directly and showing strong accountability for what we actually did wrong. Vision is a party of Neomasculine men who use Neofeminine strategies to defend themselves poorly. As the Thai say; “same, same, but different”. As Natural Law states; like and unlike are the same, extremes meet.
   
   A warm blanket of compassion and empathy may have got these men out of hell, but accountability gets them to the next step, and that ain’t happening here yet.

7. The Outdoors and Freedom Party; is a party of Liberals and Feminine types who love the environment, hate poison, and can’t market with brevity to save themselves. Currently, their party name is five words, every other party knows that three words are the goal. Soon, ODFP will become The Outdoors, Freedom, and Truth Party; ODFTP. This will make them an ideal candidate for the alphabet-loving Transgender Starscream Decepticons that are manifesting everywhere at the moment.
   
   The problem with this party is it’s all concept and very little content. They didn’t consider their approach carefully enough and made it easy for the media to turn them into the anti-party. Had they focused on competently marketing the alternative remedy, and not waged passive-aggressive warfare on their Conservative members through dishonest gossip and innuendo; they would be the ideal party for Farmers, Hunters, Natural advocates, and Free Marketeers. Instead, they allow their President to engage in foolish vague jabs at their competition/allies. Sadly, this has damaged the party so much, that it looks like a repeat of the Billy Te Kahika saga. Where they will lose half of their votes to people who are preaching the same thing.

8. Freedoms NZ; is the saving grace of both the above parties. The only party that has secured proof that Sue Grey, Hannah and Brian Tamaki are committed to unifying the vote. The problem? Few want to work with them. Do they have to? No, they just have to agree on what they already agree on and unite the party vote to get the strongest voices in there. Who are the strongest voices? Leighton Baker, Alfred Ngaro, Sue Grey, Hannah Tamaki, Liz Gunn, Donna Pokere-Phillips, Guy Slocum, Matt King, Maki Herbert, and Helen Houghton. How many is that? Ten. Based on the last election’s statistics and growing distrust in the establishment, how many seats are they likely to get if they united their party votes? Seventeen to eighteen seats. Yeah, almost twice the amount they need.
   
   That’s why people can be forgiven for thinking that all of them are dividing the vote on purpose. Some will claim that Freedoms NZ has divided the vote through poorly thought-out controversy, and the rest have divided it through lack of trust and incompetency. The truth? A bit of both, the individuals that could unite them offend them. So, they choose to live in blissful ignorance by telling people that those people are just their enemies. Dumb.

9. Democracy NZ; is the party for the honorable Constables who remain in the Crown’s social-engineering enforcement bureau. Matt King comes across as an honourable and naïve man who really shouldn’t be, he’s been in Parliament. He’s seen what I have seen and what my family knows of Parliament. A cesspit of narcissism and idiocy that has infected the worldview of many who work in the public and private sectors. Those who work for narcissists and the Flying Monkeys of Narcissists have a shit work life, or they just utilize a technique called blissful ignorance. Where they commit to doing nothing substantial about a growing problem until it becomes an untenable problem for them personally.
   
   Why will this party not solve the problem? Because of what I just outlined above; the psychology that afflicts them. Their Constitution is almost the same as the New Zeal Party; more or less a printout template from the incorporated society website. Incorporated with who? The entity that wanted to test out gene-editing and biotech integration on all of you through coercion and force? Blissful ignorance, it’s great until all of a sudden it’s not. That’s where the saying; “bad things happen when good men do nothing” comes from.

10. Leighton Baker Party; if the Crown wasn’t looking for me, so they could drag me into court and have a judge try to directive me into his jurisdiction of fraud concealment, I would change my name to Leighton Baker and join the army of two Leighton Baker candidates. Why? Because he destroyed Mike Hosking when he interviewed him during the occupation. Did he do it with nastiness? Far from it. He did it with Jordan Peterson's precision and Leighton Baker's grace. That’s why this guy shot up in the national polls for preferred leader, he did his job and he did it well. The media tried to take him down with their best gun and it back-fired. So, what did they do? Stopped interviewing him properly, and his support crew allowed whoever does his marketing to drop the ball.
    

    Seriously? The Leighton Baker Party? Yep, and it hints at a good long-game strategy. Become competent leaders in your community in media, law, and moral business around the country. Then, network a collective of competencies and run as independent people. Then create an open-source alliance, workshop the strategy with other moralists, and change everything at once every day. Change the culture, management, psychological health, and finance. See how easy that was? Well sure, that’s the concept what’s the plan? Ah, now you’re getting it!

11. Rock The Vote; A party of well-meaning Aucklanders who are trying to help with mediation between smaller parties. There are many very wise individuals in this party who have a lot to offer psychologically to all those who are trying to navigate through this madness. Too small to make any large impact popularity-wise, but good things often come in small packages.

12. Heartland; A South Auckland-based party that is aiming to be an advocate for the production-based fringe area of Auckland. It is insane that our biggest city is greedily wiping out its productive boundaries in favour of more identical unproductive suburbs. Yet another party with competent points, but very little awareness to help them be heard.

13. New Zealand Loyal; Liz Gunn, the woman who had enough of not hearing it how it is, and went out to hear it from the people. She literally gave all of us a voice. Literally. That’s all you need from a policy marketer. They need to be able to give you a voice, and thanks to her interviewing we were given a platform to get people on task. Are they going to be kind to people who are using repetition and no open debate on whether we keep doing the half-truths or whether we pursue truth in a difficult manner? After all, the Conservatives are being squeezed and separated by suspicion and lack of trust. Lack of consistency is killing all of us, and that will be the future implosion of NZLoyal, a problem we all have in common.

    

    The only party that got registered without a Constitution is NZLoyal. Who else thinks that’s strange considering they are the party to “bring down the establishment” and bind the establishment to a “Constitution for the people and by the people?” What’s the reason for this oversight?

    

    Before you get triggered, take this into account. It is my opinion that the flagship policy for NZLoyal should be the creation of a lawful nation-state bound to a Constitution. Something that can challenge the Corporate State’s fraudulent sovereign status. Sure, the Financial Transaction Tax can be the carrot, but if your most important policy is overshadowed by the fact that you got registered without a Constitution, and you are the only party that did, then that will start to create all sorts of questions around the consistency of the party’s foundation.

    NZ Loyal’s lack of consistency comes from trauma, shame, and an understandable feeling of not being heard. It’s a temporarily motivated group of individuals who can burst into action to get behind a campaign that has heart. Yet soon, the contradictory absolutism of warmongering will start to bubble to the surface. Much like the Advance NZ Party it will implode under the weight of all their unaddressed issues, and the lack of a proper Masculine structure to address those issues. NZLoyal says all the right things, but if you look closely at the registered party website and their policies; you won’t see much in the way of a plan.
    
    What about the Financial Transaction Tax Policy? Yeah, it’s a great policy! I know this because I was in a party that cost and marketed this policy; Social Credit. Yet, every poorly planned and poorly executed policy can create an abundance of problems for every hypothetical solution. That’s why Conservatives are helpful people if we give them the space to explain their concerns. How does the policy work? It attempts to tax every transaction that occurs in the government’s jurisdiction. Where is the government’s jurisdiction? Wherever you as a New Zealand citizen consent to it being. Would it work on those who are smart and wealthy enough not to consent to a criminal organisation stealing their money? Only if those individuals used a transaction service owned or registered to that criminal entity.
    
    What would help an FTT get the biggest bang for it’s use? Well, that would be through CBDCs. So, yes it’s a great policy and great theory, but it has fish hooks that need to be fleshed out. It should not be a flagship policy of a party that is supposed to be marketing the remedy to the WEF’s stupid agenda. Why? Because the WEF would love this policy, it would work brilliantly with their forced centralization transaction model. It’s like coming up with a brilliant monetary policy called Social Credit, and not changing the name of the monetary policy when Western critics of the CCP start calling their social-engineering system Social Credit. That’s why it is a stupid idea to push out supporters who criticize their inconsistencies with provable facts.

The problem we all have; is contradiction and refusal to admit when we are wrong, combined with the lack of competent remedy. That is why all these parties exist, and that is also why they will always fail. Workplaces that are dedicated to positive results need people who are positive and are willing to shred an idea through critical analysis. Sometimes, the latter triggers people. Sometimes those people start making stories up about what happened in that triggering situation. Then they might start collecting story soldiers, unwitting people who are understandably demoralized and ready to believe things they didn’t witness themselves. After all, what is being done to us by the establishment is a well-known warfare tactic called demoralization. Remember, Sun Tzu is their bible, demoralization is how you win a war and all future wars without firing a single bullet. It’s just cheaper.

That’s why I only have time for policy and law, in this world no one is fit to govern me or any other law-abiding man or woman. I don’t want to become a victimhood-obsessed transgender Starscream Decepticon. I don’t want to watch our wahine be legally designated as birthing slaves, and I don’t want to be a part of a society that says I can’t leave if they suddenly become a criminal organization. I don’t care what any of you; “poll your way to a solution dogmatists” say, this isn’t personal. Please don’t email me with replies like “fuck you, Brad”. Especially, if you don’t reply when I ask; “What didn’t you like about the article? That’s just what someone says when you say something true and they don’t like that you said it in front of everyone. It’s called shame, and it’s the prison that rules the life of all inconsistent people who tell themselves there is comfort in this inconsistency. Who does that? Every leader that does not live up to the position.

The irony? Persons who pretend to play leaders cannot live up to actual leaders, that’s why politicians and lawyers feel shame, and it’s why they’re happy to wage psychological war on those they blame. What would you do if your life was a prison? Get the politicians out of that fucking building, don’t put more in, the problem is the foundations of that place. This country isn’t run by politicians, it’s being manipulated into implosion by politicians. What does a proper problem solver do when trying to solve a problem? Get the problem out of the space that is creating the problems and then assess, don’t just put more problems in there before assessing.

What’s the solution? Wrong question, what do the people in this country need considering the international situation? The ability to sustain ourselves if the world continues to lose its mind. Why do we think the world is losing its mind? Because we’ve been right about most things so far, look around you, hyper inflation didn’t just magically appear. Are we building a collective and multi-faceted solution from a variety of approach angles with some synergy? Well, I don’t know. What would I be good at? Good question, maybe you should figure that out and do it! What policies would help develop my solution angle? Good question, that’s why you should engage with policy. The next article will be an energy independence policy. Keep paying attention.