Once upon a time I decided to get into politics to help effect “real change”. I was naive, I thought that politics was the place where governance of the country was conducted in its entirety. I thought that during the decades of our unconscious total pursuit of materialism, our governance had slipped away from us, and it was all because the people we voted for had betrayed us through apathy inspiring words, and an abundance of our own ignorance. That’s not an incorrect assumption, but it is a very shallow assessment of the problem. We are talking about the governance of around five million people and an inter-connected international trade network of billions of people. That also includes larger countries that constantly engage in economic and psychological warfare onto other Nations. They do this in an effort to turn our people into their persons, we then vote in con-artist persons who flood our country with more of their persons who are indoctrinated by their governments.
Let’s be honest here, you need much more than just politics to keep that under control. Further to that, you need much more than just politics to silently benefit from a hidden form of modern mind slavery and trust theft. Government. The intent of government was to protect our world view. Instead, it became a tool to mold our world view. What would happen if another mindset hijacked it? You’re living through it, how’s it going for you? You see, the modern sophists in parliament don’t care about true Kiwis anymore. In fact, they probably don’t care about anything outside of energy accumulation. Politics is an echo chamber of scripted division that keeps you fighting over “their” differences, while those short-sighted and selfish sociopaths worship the God of materialism. All the while, they claim to be ideological atheists, megalomaniac idols, or blind followers of an idea of God’s will.
The truth is, you need a lot more cooperation than just those who market self-benefitting policy to the masses. You need businesses, corporations, media, “non-governmental”-organizations, clubs, societies, fake activists, incorporations, and celebrities. For over a decade of inquisitive observation I have learned that the only people who don’t believe in large complex conspiracies are the one’s who aren’t smart enough to concoct one for themselves. Or, maybe they are not part of one and therefore lack perspective, or are, and just don’t realise it. After all, a productive farm needs some sheep. With all the data I’ve collected, I’ve come to the conclusion that power is secured by those who plan and conspire ruthlessly and efficiently. Those who assume that our world isn’t directed by those who plan and conspire well, have the mental capacity of cattle. You know you’re probably going to the freezing works, but what are you going to do about it? You’re just a herd of sheep and he’s just one farmer, that grass isn’t going to eat itself.
Once upon a time I thought like Voices for Freedom, I thought that we needed to “wake-up” everybody in the “wobbly middle”. Yet, what good are people who are “awake” to the nature of power, but aren’t aware of how it degrades your own leaders? With more perspective gained, I wonder whether you need to turn every sheep on the battlefield into a soldier to win a war against the one percent of parasitic con-artists? Thanks to advice from those who learned long ago, when to keep their mouths shut, how to stay invisible, and when to execute, I know that’s not necessary at all. All we need to do is find those who are willing to do something substantive about it, and convince them to become the symbiotic-evolving-active change we want to see in the world.
One such change that will help our pursuit of unity, right now, is the integration of accountability into “leadership”.
Recently, a few parties have been hit in the face with some wero o te mana! If you don’t know what that means you should learn. It’s part of the unique fabric of our shared culture, and it feels empowering to speak it properly. Further to that, the active nature of our culture is masculine, and it’s just what we need in a social environment careening toward the apathetic victimhood gutter. If our culture has been subverted, so foreign interests and foreign ideology can invade our country without firing a single bullet, then those claiming they’ll stop that through political narratives need to grow some balls. Not chop them off or advocate for chopping them off.
The two party leaders in question have not physically chopped their balls off, nor do they advocate for men doing that so they can dribble sitting down in a woman’s toilet or cheat in women’s competition. But they may as well chop their balls off with their lack of accountability, constitutional incompetence, lack of accuracy, and effeminate narratives. The result? Division. But who are their followers blaming? The ones who wanted accountability in exchange for unity! This is the insanity of political and religious dogma, it turns those who just realised there’s a problem with our Nation’s direction, into ignorant unity cravers. People who know that lack of accountability is a hallmark of the ideological dogma that caused all of this, but still think that another form of unaccountable dogma will be the solution!
Political flag wavers declared division when Counterspin and Samantha Edwards did their job. They also accosted the resigning Democracy NZ candidates for pointing out the structural problems of board controlled incorporated societies that umbrella their policy marketing entity (Democracy NZ). The Counterspin backlash was driven by the same victimhood drivel and contradictory babble of their so-called enemies - radical left-wing ideologues. Which to someone who has a passion for political psychology is quite understandable. Natural Law expresses itself in everything, in psychology, it declares that like and unlike are the same; extremes meet. After years of experience, hanging out with charismatic political hopefuls who have next to no philosophical clout, I know how badly they all need good direct advisors. I also know how unlikely it is that many of your “Freedom” political choices will listen to good advice.
The truth is, your leaders are creatures of the megalomaniac environments you have all created around them. You make them future tyrants that may replace the current ones by allowing them to escape relevant questions with your unwavering ignorance. Jacinda Ardern had several hundred thousand followers, your champions only have thousands. How are you going to competently implement accountability in government and governance if you cant enforce it on your own leaders? Your trustees so to speak. How many of you have read your party’s Constitutions? How many of you have read the Constitutions of their incorporated or unincorporated societies? Should they be incorporated with the Crown or unincorporated with the Crown? An entity that is engaging in unlawful acts and getting worse with time. All questions you should all be asking, and quickly! The ball is in your court. Choose wisely and efficiently. You should not be shooting those who are seeking accountability from those who claim they will get accountability for all of us.
You should be listening to them, and if doing so triggers you, good. You need to learn how to deal with offence so you can seek out the facts. Not doing that got you all here in the first place. I think we can all agree, that if we regularly bound our “representatives” to our terms of accountability, we would be in a better place right now. Do you know where that is done? In Constitutions. Right now, the only competency the Freedom and Truth movement have is media entities, the diligent people who run them for free, and Leighton Baker. It’s sad, but it would be even sadder if you all chose popularity over competence again. I’m glad you are all “awake”, but when are you all going to upgrade yourselves into being aware?
Remember the quote from Mark Twain - "If voting made a difference, they wouldn't let us use it" Mark Twain slyly reminds us that votes are often empty gestures and corruption is the order of the day, he suggests that there's no such thing as democracy. Seems like nothing has changes.
Very good Brad, I have come to similar conclusions.
We must chat at some point.