Policy

Every day I will release the policies I wrote for the 2020 election, which are updated for this election. Starting with this Policy Overview.

Most people believe that policies are representative of what policy opticians will do. History should have taught them that they are representative of what they say they will do.

When most people look for a party to rally behind, they are looking for principles and solutions that suit their world view. Politicians call these policies because they are marketers of policy, they are in the business of policy optics. Hence the word politician, if you need your sight checked, you see an optician, if you want your political perspective warped, see a politician. Through lack of consideration for the world view of others, people get sucked into political division, we assemble under a variety of false idols. This allows shallow policy writers the ability to exploit group desires, especially if that specific demographic is large. Group affirmation helps to reaffirm dogma, the size of the group determines the intensity of the attachment to that dogma. Political personalities, promises, and arguments become centre focus, and whoever is better at encouraging persons that their “policies” will “provide” for the largest demographic, “wins”. These are in quotations because most people don’t know that the bible of a politician or a lawyer is Sun Tzu’s the Art of War. In war there is no winner, only losers and future losers.

Sadly, Policy optics has become used car salesmen selling you narratives while rarely disclosing their contractual commitments to your opposing interests. The fallout to this? You don’t get what you are entitled to, your values get neglected, government props up its mob’s views over those who have different views, governance becomes manipulation, your taxed energy gets wasted, national division is maintained, and those who climb to the top of society manage to consolidate power through increased social influence of modern sophistry.

What’s the problem? A structure that was meant to be representative of your trust; a continual evolution of the collective’s benefit, is now tuned to benefit its new owners. Once an entity controls all this structure’s components through the mass encouragement of a self-detrimental state-of-mind; debtor, it’s all downhill from there. Governance no longer maintains what you need to thrive, it becomes a mechanism through which lobbyists can manipulate you. This isn’t the pursuit of balanced consensus governance nor is it a path towards collective growth. A place where constituent values are represented wisely through the expression of true centrist actions. In fact, those who push government in its current direction are the types that have given up on mentoring people. They instead, view their monetary success as the measurement of their worthiness while they crush what’s left of their spirit by telling their empathy to go.

These people benefit from marketing hopium to you. Our country and your children make sacrifices to these idols because they believe they are polling in honorable trustees, only to be deceived. Quality time with loved ones being one of the saddest sacrifices we make in order to pay off the debt of con-artists. After all, quality time with loved ones develops empathy. Some are in my position, trying to convince as many as possible that you owe fraudsters nothing! That the solution to foundational fraud is not more narcissists singing your policies with smooth, but inherently fraudulent rhetoric. The answer is to empower you with swords of wisdom with the skill to use them. If the meek inherit a world ruled by the callous, then the population of the meek needs to grow. Our children’s future relies on that.

None of us want to leave things in a worsened state for the most important people in our lives, so what must we do?

Everyone who is collecting a Law Library should have this book, as much of our Tikanga is contained within.

I think we should look to our elders, many of the whakatauki and whakatauāki they spoke echo the maxims of law. There are words that should echo into eternity, so we might learn the lesson before it is too late. Maxims and the wise words of Te Uri o Māui which is who we are, we are not Māori. Māori means white prey or the hunted to those who write statute, but to those who hunt quarry in the ngahere or in the wai it means by way of prey. Māui is the demigod of questions, Māui translates to; by way of the question. That is why our maxims and our wise words are longstanding pathways that carve a narrow path to the truth. Through these we learn that our core values are; Tino Rangatiratanga, Turangawaewae, Kaitiakitanga, and Manaakitanga. They also say that we should make decisions that uphold these values equitably. Thus, we don’t takahi (abuse) the mana of one value to hypothetically raise up another. This principle of valuing the input of the well-mentored many, is a hallmark of the decentralized nature of our culture and our surroundings. It is also a hallmark of a stable western society. The only unity that works, decentralized unity.

How to unite the advocates of decentralization against the advocates for forced centralization; Enlightened Absolutists. You unite their party vote, what do you do if they refuse to do that? Good question hard to answer.

This election, I will not ask you to poll for a political party. In fact, I’ve committed to writing articles that educate people on the reasons why you shouldn’t. No one has taken up my offer to debate me on why advocating for conscientious objection of the corporate polls is not a free speech protected stance. NZLoyal policy marketing admins on Telegram are removing profiles of people who support them, but suspect they might influence people to get off the election roll. Why? Our lawful point of view does not support their mandate, so they presume and then they remove. Yes, just like the government did with the mandates and pub spaces. Someone in NZLoyal’s hierarchy better tell their minions to value the principle of free speech. No one consistent will support them if their advocates are inconsistent.

Voting or polling for a party in a rigged system will not solve this problem, that process is for the public, not the free. It wont do anything for you other than convince the public to support freedom over the construction of a prison. In order to do that, you will need consistency and timing. All that matters is the promotion of sound policies that benefit the consensus. After all, politicians have a terrible record of failing you, hopefully you do not. That’s why my policies will have a policy dedicated to remediating our psychology.

Alongside writing articles that help you see the psychological contradictions of your options, I will encourage all of you to look at their policies. Do the policies create a strong concept that shows promise toward making our people’s lives better? Will it make the land, air, and water better? Do they have a competent and feasible plan to give those policies the best chance of succeeding? Does their constitution adequately constrain them to principles that raise the chances of that plan’s success? Do they even have a viewable Constitution? Will these collective considerations set up a thriving future for our children, and elevate their value on this land? Are their plans means-tested with proof-of-concept feasibility? Can you see a competent vision? Will that vision make this country a positive influence on the rest of the world? A land that sees the first light becoming the light of example to a world succumbing to a manufactured mass psychosis.

Thankfully, she’s coming back on the 20th of September for imaginary period throwers theatre show. Location to be confirmed.

Can your options be trusted to act out this plan, and if things don’t work, will they own their mistakes and adapt? Will they be bound to the principles of all their beneficiaries or will they pander to the popular madness of the mob? Will you, the supposed beneficiaries be wise enough to keep an eye on those trusted to execute the will of your trust? Who is mentoring you on wisdom? Do you know the difference between wisdom and intelligence? Do you use your intellectual edge over people to manipulate them, or do you try with earnest to mentor them?

The parties that have been there nine years in, nine years out for decades, have used manipulation. Changing who leads the party has not ever changed the company or association direction for the better. Why? Because the organisation or office has not changed. Sadly, our freedom parties have only ever shown that they are all concept and little content. All policy and no working plan, and that is not good either. Unfortunately, our opposition can roll out the plan, it’s just a really bad one. What we need is a concept that is actually good, and a competent and consistent plan to roll it out. The problem I think, is our greedy unwillingness to teach our people all things. After all, how are we to overcome those who plan poor concepts in secrecy, if we cannot plan good concepts well because our people don’t know how to think for themselves?

This election, I want you to try something different. I don’t want you to focus on who you are voting for, I want you to focus on learning what policies are needed, right now! Consider what’s happening internationally. You live on an island far from everyone else, and you are so dependent on importation it makes up 51% of your “carbon-footprint”. Rank order priority and sustainability matters too! How is your political team going to implement policies through sound plans if you don’t know the plan?

I want you to ask questions of those who seek to lead you. I want you to take proper steps toward becoming the change we all need in this world. We claim politicians are the problem, yet we also acknowledge that this entire system is based on consent, so you put them in there. If you are locked in a pattern of putting in Narcissists and their flying monkeys, then you are the problem too. You do not know how to identify weak constitutions and frauds, not just in form but in the substance of the representatives you support. That is what needs to be remedied. Ultimately, all our problems are psychological problems and interpersonal problems. Your opposition is working hard to create psychological epidemics out of you, you prevent that by strengthening your constitution and the constitution of others.

So, utilize your gut, heart, and mind correctly. Check to see if your party’s policies display a solid plan. If they don’t, question them. If they don’t stand up to questioning or debate, or they avoid those who are excellent at checking their constitution, don’t poll for them. Read their policies, seek to comprehend the policies, ask how they will implement them, and then poll or don’t poll accordingly. You don’t have to be on this electoral roll, you can leave and join others. If you live in a free society then you should be able to leave. I think that the responsibility of whether people poll or not is entirely on those options who claim they can govern well and that includes us.

So, my promise to you is simply this; I promise to make every intelligent effort to create policies that suit all the people I have listened to for years. I promise to own my mistakes and find new angles to solve our problems. If the system does not allow for the best possible way to achieve that, then I will tell you the system needs to change. However, I am not a chuck the baby out with the bathwater kind of guy, that’s our opposition. But, I do need your help to do a good job of changing the system without burning the good. Consciousness is an endless ocean that we are all connected to, we need each other to know it’s depths.

Those who seek to build constituent serving trusts are simply a trusted extension of you, the beneficiary. We can’t make the change that needs to happen without your help and knowledge. Through our plan, we will make it so your collective say can have a say in the governance you build. If I can’t convince you of the genuineness of my policy; that is on me, not you. Good teachers know that if we blame the class, then no one can solve the problem with the class and therefore, he who blames the class shouldn’t be teaching it. That goes for governance too. We need the full picture to make the right decisions and that only comes from listening to those who make up the full picture.

It is the case that many heads are better than one, and a country competently governed through the enhancement of the people is a magnification of that. So, everyday I will release a policy I have written, I want your feedback. I also want help to develop plans for all these policies. The reason for this is that anything could happen in this election, your team probably won’t get in, and you may be tempted to allow that to further demoralize you. Yet, take a breath it’s ok. The fight to have good policy, remedies, and plans that actually create a better future for life, never ends. I’ve learnt a lot over the past ten years in activism and politics, made a lot of mistakes, but I’m grateful for that, now I can go off in a better direction than I was, thanks to a new position of experience. I wish the same for you, and I hope that you can wish the same for others.  

I may have a lot of the concepts right, but it is all for nothing if the execution is off. The lesson for me and all those in the decentralized unity movement? Work on focus and execution of the plan.

Repetition of where the numbers are at in terms of concerns. People are struggling because things are unaffordable, things are unaffordable because we lack infrastructure that provides the things every industry of substance needs. First policy off the blocks: Energy Independence.