Why You Shouldn't Vote For Act In 2023
Why shouldn't you vote for a party that converts grassroots Libertarians into new-age Communists?
The answer to the above question seems obvious, yet you who might “reject the premise of that question”, might have a point. After all, it implies that Act is not a Libertarian party and is using the yellow skin of the grapefruit to hide it’s Communist flesh. First question; what do you mean by Communist? Billy Te Kahika got caught in this trap in his Māori Television debate as Communist was a term that was meant to mean something akin to Manaakitanga, or communal support. What Billy and I mean by Communist, is a social approach that is all hypothetical intent and no content. It is something that uses the mask of Manaakitanga to usher in a forced or coerced form of power centralisation. One that undermines all the other values we hold dear.
Values like; Tino Rangatiratanga, Turangawaewae, and Kaitiakitanga. If we were properly upholding law (Tikanga) we would be implementing democratically developed policies that did not abuse (takahi) the integrity (mana) of other values. That ain’t happening though is it?
Our culture is one that is supposed to uphold the pure nature of decentralized unity. The true intention of a working democracy. One that doesn’t manipulate people through the long populist march through the institutions (Communism), but instead; patiently takes the longer march through the individuals. As wisdom dictates; all I know is never all I could know. The ACT party is supposed to be the embodiment of this, and maybe when it was under the vocal direction of Rodney Hide it was. Not anymore, today it is directed by the Modern Sophist that is David Seymour.
You see, you can’t just manipulate people to agree with policies of forced centralization through the corporate bastardisation of kindness. Otherwise known as nicety. You have to be clever, not everyone is sucked in by fake emotional clap trap. Some people care about “reason” more than nicety. For those people, you need modern sophistry done with some cheeky arrogance. You need a twerking Neoliberal midget who can inspire ignorant selfishness out of the business owner and contractor class. You need someone who can convince them that Libertarianism is only for them, not their employees. Someone who unconsciously states; “rules for thee, but not for me”. Thus, making them no better than the contradictory twits coming out of university. The result? An unproductive and toxic workplace that benefits no one here.
ACT is little more than a manipulative echo chamber for disaffected farmers, gun-owners, and small to large business owners. It collects MPs from these disaffected regions, people who are against an immoral centralising entity. Proceeds to feed them Parliament ideologies with repetition, rewards them with paychecks that over compensate for the work they actually do, while affirming their new neoliberal psychology with marketing affirmation rituals. Wallah! You’ve just successfully converted farmers like Mark Cameron into slick talking naïve parrots. They no longer see the mask of nicety that politicians wear to hide their nasty interior, because now; they have become that. Combine that fact with their growing ego and now you understand how the Beehive changes people into scum.
I’ve heard this from my critics repeatedly, critics who claim they oppose politicians. “None of the politicians want to work with you Brad, no one likes you”. The former is true, fake people don’t like being in the same room as someone who will never be fooled by their bullshit. The only way to hide from people like me is to say nothing at all, and that’s impossible for politicians. Marketing dystopia for you and utopia for them is their job. It’s not true that no one likes me. Then again, most are the contradictory type that hates politicians when they’re screwing you over, but supports them when they proclaim to be the solution to the current rape that afflicts you. What’s that solution? Raping someone else! Who hasn’t been mandated yet? Beneficiaries!
The above paragraph is how politicians who market hypothetical reason ensnare naïve pollsters. Statements that have something true mixed with a lie. Being disliked by every politician should signal decency to all who oppose the corruption in politics. Yet, the combination of a lie changes the context of the whole statement. Politicians do this all the time. They lace their narratives with some truth to get you nodding and then they’ll slight of hand some subtle bullshit in there. Below are some ACT party examples:
The Act party will complete the centralisation of the District Health Boards by getting rid of the Māori Health Authority.
The Act party supports compulsory track and tracing
The Act party supports the intensification of our developing weapons-based policy enforcing corporation, otherwise known as the Police.
As the Dig In At Marsden, we went to one of David Seymour’s meet and greets with a plan. We went prepared with questions so we could video him lying his ass off and release it for this election. Unfortunately, most activists are as compromised as your politicians. Thankfully, David’s giant second in charge has already let this slip. One of the policies that ACT is set to market in the coming government is the further centralisation of the District Health Board to “save money” and “make information sharing more efficient”. Whether it actually does that or not is debatable. Generally, I’m of the opinion that health is a holistic consideration. If our food and medicine marketing is mostly directed toward encouraging poor health. Then the socialist “health” system will become overburdened, and the corporate “health” industry will make lots of money.
What isn’t debatable is the obvious breach of doctor patient confidentiality that would eventuate from a centralised system. Furthermore, it makes one wonder; how is Pfizer going to get a hold of all of the rest of that precious health data as part of the government’s contract with them? You know, the redacted one we’re not allowed to see? If data/money is held in a decentralized manner. Thus, making it harder for centralized entities to acquire a monopoly on it to never pay off their debt. What must this centralized entity do? Market centralization with the right guy for the current public psychosis; who’s the right guy? David Seymour! If Seymour was a Libertarian he’d be marketing the importance of everyone to be mindful of their data. It’s valuable, persons want it. Yet, he can’t do that, he’s the Crown’s bitch, so he’ll promote policies like this and…
Compulsory tracing and tracking in a failed attempt to track “viruses”. Fortunately, that’s not what it’s for, that’s just a front. It’s about money. This will help monopolies to increase their monopoly over the market by increasing convenience faster than everyone else. The goal is to make the acquisition of short-term gratification so effortless that New Zealand’s consumer future is a version of the Axiom in the movie Wall-E. Where all of us rely on an expensive and unsustainable path to do-nothing-ville, where all “difficult” jobs are done by rare-earth metals, and life is a hypothetical neoliberal utopia. Yay! What does that mean for the Conservative/Masculine polarity? Good question, now you know why Andrew Tate is popular amongst young men…
That’s were ACT’s blue army policy comes in, where we turn our peace-keeping Constables into a peace enforcement bureau. They’ll cloak this in a tough on gangs approach, yet how do you define a gang when the biggest gang is the Crown? If the Crown continues to create enemies by behaving like a highly intelligent criminal, then it’s going to need to pour more money into policy enforcement. If the neoliberal’s great replacement process is one that is fundamentally based around emasculating the masculine to create a “peaceful” utopia, then they’re going to need some uninformed masculine types to stop the eventual pushback. Unfortunately, there’s no short supply of those. That population will only grow thanks to the transformation of education into a new form of ideological indoctrination. It makes sense, the Neofeminine can’t beat the Masculine in a physical struggle, so she’s decided to just turn all the boys into girls through affirmative “psychology”.
Some of you might be a bit pissed because you were hoping I was going to critique ACT’s policies point by point. I get why you feel that way, and that’s fair, ACT has done a good job of turning your money into a highly convincing front. You’re probably a details type and that’s why policy optics works on you. The problem with us masculine types is we tend to get so stuck in the details that we can’t see the forest for the trees. It’s a very masculine flaw that is the root cause of most of our conflict with our feminine partners. We get so obsessed with our thing-based passions that we neglect everyone else around us. People like our children, those we borrow this world from.
That’s the point, if we allow shallow fools like David Seymour to guide us down a path that benefits their manipulative little club, then it’s our children that will suffer. They’ll either suffer under them or become them, either outcome should be untenable to good men and women. If we continue to be agreeable toward content less persons just because they’ve mastered rhetoric, then we will lose out to the “clever” few. ACT is no different to the Greens, they’re just the other dividing voice that sounds appealing to those who have been disaffected by emotional clap trap. Don’t fall for it.