Why You Shouldn't Poll For ... In 2023?

Who is going to save us from the Globalists, the Transformers, and the Pedophiles? Marketers of Policy!

Every time “politicians” shit all over the populace, a few more psychological baskets manifest to capture the minds of those who need a hypothetical savior.

Last election year, I wrote a series of articles that put a bee in the bonnet of many dogmatic political followers. Ironically, people loved the articles about the parties they didn’t support, but hated the articles about the ones they did support (Some New Conservative Party supporters were an exception). This year I will be doing it again. So, in preparation for that inevitable problem, I'm going to write this article for all of the party dogmatists. First, some points to consider before reading the articles that address specific parties.

1. I don’t care about the success of any of these political parties. Through my experience with the leaders of many of these parties, most seem to have a well-hidden character that is distasteful to the future of humanity. Observation of their lack of personal growth has made me cynical and callous. However, it is with context; I despise manipulators, and almost all politicians are manipulators. Generally, I now support military action as a part solution to our current existential problems. The hypothetical evolution of the disingenuous behaviour that got us into this mess is not going to get us out of it. After all, the definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over again whilst expecting different results. You don’t deserve that level of stupidity and neither do our children.

2. I don’t have a personal gripe with any of these parties or individuals, they are all marketers of policy, nothing more. The articles will focus on the content of the policies, how they are marketed, and the competence of the party and their leaders.

3. Keep in mind, you are not voting in who will run the country. If you still think that, you need to de-program that shit out of your head. It’s not logical, it has no evidence or proof to support it, and the reality of the situation is right in front of your faces.

Let’s be honest, anyone who thinks voting/polling is the solution to all our problems hasn’t thought about it much, has lost their mind, or never had a mind to begin with. But hey! That’s the status of the vast majority of the “polling” populace anyway. So, when we are looking to solve the massive shit-pile that is the corruption of the administration sector of society, we need to consider more broadly. There’s the massive new ideological problem too; the problem of thinking that the best replacement to warfare against evil abroad, is to wage a stealth war on everyone at home. The problem is a state of mind that is fundamentally contradictory, and that state of mind is administering our direction. Either way, we will have to come up with a policy marketing plan that:

1. Convinces people that we have a massive ideological and dysfunctional problem in government, governance, legal, and the corporations/banks that own them.

2. Identifies precisely and accurately what that ideological problem is and why it is a problem.

3. Markets a solution that actually has proof that it will work based on thousands of years of collective perspective.

First and foremost, it’s important to frame this angle honestly. It is just policy marketing. Politicians do not “run” your country. If they did, you would be constantly experiencing the “nice” hell that you experienced under a Neofeminist DJ. I comprehend why people think they run the country, but when you think about it for longer than three seconds. It becomes apparent as to why you now think you are stupid for believing that was what they did at all. Yet, you protest. They sit in ministerial positions, and bring in Acts of Parliament for the administration of legal affairs in business! That’s what we mean by “running the country”. Yeah, yeah, except they don’t do that either. What they do, is market the policies with charismatic speech, now defined as modern sophistry. That then leads to the inevitable creation of Acts, that may or may not reflect the law. They don’t write them and they don’t plan them, that’s another department.

Just as the board of incorporated societies run its parties, the board of the Corporate State runs everything that is incorporated with it. That’s why all Acts bind the Crown, everything registered to it is considered an instrument of it.

How do I know this? Because the structure of societal mind control is more complicated than that. That’s why they have structures like the Office of the Clerk, the New Zealand Initiative, lobbyists/consultants, media, paid-off twats, and very large corporations that benefit from having individuals in influential positions on the board of the New Zealand Initiative. Administrative tyranny is a large, interconnected and complicated business model, one I still don’t fully comprehend. It’s made more complicated by chains of contracts and confidentiality agreements that may bind naïve newcomers to international trading partners. Especially, if those newcomers have no legal protections and lawful chains that bind them to their constituents.

This is a Corporate State, it doesn’t work for you, just like your boss doesn’t work for you. It works for international trading agreements and the entities it owes.

As the old saying goes; “the devil is in the details of the contracts you sign”. Con can be defined in two ways, it means "to study, get to know, peruse carefully," and if you fail to do that then the second definition may apply; “to swindle”. That’s why your best allies are the one’s you least expect. Guys like Kelvyn Alp, who’s motto for Counterspin Media is; “Question Everything”. A frequent repetition that has emanated from the sharp tongue of Kelvyn is; “show us the unredacted Pfizer contract”. The thing the whole Corporate State signed us up to, and that’s just the tip of the iceberg!

The fact is, you all consent to a Corporate State signing all consenting persons up to contracts that don’t benefit you. How? By polling in their instruments under the false belief that they serve you! Do we need a Corporate State? Sure, we need something to maintain and manage our trade agreements so our Nation ship can thrive on the treacherous seas of commerce. Yet, what is that corporate captain and his first-mates bound to so he doesn’t end up working for a foreign ship? At the moment, the ship is bound to the remaining trustee of Te Tiriti. What’s the Captain bound to? International Trading Partners and foreign debt. What’s the trustee bound to? Good Question. Are the Rangatira of the United Tribes bound to a beneficiary created Constitution or Covenant?

Our People have always been proud to proclaim the fact that they retained their form-based sovereignty. Yet, they never engaged in any meaningful effort to constrain those they imbue with authority.

That’s why I don’t care about Julian Batchelor’s Co-Governance tour. He wants people to be concerned about this as if supremacist-based tyranny is something we don’t already have. We already have Co-Government masquerading as Co-Governance, we’ve had it for centuries. It started with two trustees to a Declaration of Independence. A trading contract between the Crown of England (vacant) and the United Tribes. It then turned into a fraudulent peace treaty between the British Crown of the Holy Roman Empire, and some Rangatira who needed a break from war with the religion of forced centralisation. That story could have been told so our people could come together. Instead, Julian took on a flawed one-sided perspective and used it to benefit from a growing culture war. A culture war flame that useful idiot Neoliberals won’t stop fanning. They really should, the pendulum swing manifests in everything; the measure of the swing to the left is the measure of the swing to the right.

The next article will be about the idiocy these two are promoting.

That’s it in a nutshell for me. I don’t care about what these politicians say they are going to do. The reality is, that I know “they” can’t deliver the solution, only all of you can. What I do care about is what they market and how they market it. Essentially, whether they market the right story and policies that help us build the solution to the constant existence of malevolence. Advising them on this is pointless, they will go where the money and admiration are, as they are creatures that thrive on popularity. If an action brings them more attention from the subverted and lazy masses, then they tend to think they have done something right. The truth is likely in stark contrast to that. I will stay where the future of our species requires people like me to be; in a position that receives more misguided hate than appreciation.

After all, the world is in short supply of philosophers who are willing to carefully tread the narrow path toward the truth. This world has an overabundance of sycophantic mouthpieces who behave like they know the truth. People need to know that policy marketers only wear the mask of compassion and reason, they are not the embodiment of it. If you all want to kill yourselves over their vanity, knock yourselves out, but I wouldn’t advise it. My advice? Read more, read these articles, question these articles, and think for yourselves.

The first Party on the block will be decided by your votes. Comment below the first party you want written about, and share this with your friends. Small weekly contributions for these articles are greatly appreciated, contributions go toward the marketing of the reinstatement of our refinery. Check out our apathy assault gear here.

Next mini workshop Monday, Whangarei at the Ledge 5:30pm. Next large workshop Mangawhai, Saturday 5th of August. Email to book here and to arrange for other workshops in the North Island.