The Fall Of Investigative Media
When proof gets substituted for a hot mess of claims
Many from the realm formally known as journalism have commented on the decline in trust for mainstream media. Mike Hosking has been very up-front about the fall of his colleagues, and himself for that matter. Yet, he’ll never correctly point out why trust in the media is declining. The last statistical assumption had trust in the media at 52%. Why is it falling?
It’s because they’ve always been liars for the New Zealand Company, and now the lies are piling up, and many more are joining those who know what they are.
There’s a difference between news and opinion; there used to be a line, but that’s long gone. There’s fake news, and then there’s “fake news”. Who decides which is which? The last people you would want to decide.
Currently, the accredited fact-checkers are mostly University students; this is an important constituency to wage information war.
Step One: Get your wannabe intellectuals into massive debt to the government.
Step Two: Get them to learn everything the government wants them to know.
Step Three: Get them to join corporations as useful idiots that help roll out the lenders' total-control direction.
Dr Jonathan Haidt has been precise and measured with his research into disgust in the Universities. He describes how university minds have been subverted towards unrestricted warfare on their values.
University fact-checkers seem credible. Think I’m being sarcastic? For a good reason, those who have been brainwashed to be certain in the face of uncertainty are not reliable fact-checkers. Whether you’re an atheist university student or a religious fundamentalist, it makes little difference; certainty is the death of wisdom — those who use certainty or ignorant uncertainty as a weapon are attempting to create an environment for war.
That’s why we call pieces like Fire and Fury — a hit piece; it’s designed to “hit” the battleship of the opposing side. It’s also pre-seeding bullshit into the minds of societal mushrooms, who are fed shit and kept in the dark by the T.V. That way, they also buy the 2018 book Fire and Fury and further encapsulate their brain in black mycelium. Ready to grow some stupid ideas that were never their own, to begin with.
Paula Penfold impressed me with her systematic and efficient deconstruction of Billy Te Kahika. It was ruthless, and measured, and made Billy make simple mistakes that destroyed his image. However, had Billy kept his composure, defended himself with some backbone, and admitted to his imperfections, he may have overcome that hit piece. Sadly, Billy didn’t have a good advisor or at least one that got him to listen. That is where the Freedom movement falls short; it lacks resources and sound strategy, has poor spending habits, and lacks measured masculinity.
Yet, all those weaknesses make this hit piece an unmitigated disaster and a massive waste of money. They had all the weapons at their disposal, and an easy target — a movement that can’t demonstrate governance yet. They also had lots of money. Money that is stolen from the population of idiots and those who know they’re all criminals, but pay them anyway because they don’t realise paying them makes them a party to their crimes.
The hit-piece, Fire and Fury, was a complete mess, and Paula Penfold should be embarrassed to be part of it. It wasn’t in line with her cold, stoic, and masculine approach to investigative journalism. It was a hot mess of claims with no proof and out-of-context statements supporting a wayward hypothesis. That some hippy liberal mothers, an attractive Conservative, Counterspin, and a proud liberal capitalist are somehow part of a dangerous Neo-Nazi under-belly because they call out criminal behaviour poorly when taken out of context.
That sounds like a Conspiracy Theory!
They had all the money they needed to make it good, because they steal it from the gullible tax-payer (you).
The only question this “not-a-documentary” should pull out of the watcher is this: “Why did this hit-piece that was aiming to frame these people as Neo-Nazis focus on the moderates of the Freedom Movement and not Brian Tamaki and his worshippers? Let’s hope the 23rd of August and this hit-piece aren’t used to implicate the moderates in whatever may go wrong in Wellington on the 23rd!
I would have loved to be there to be blamed for the actions of some meth-addicted government dependents, but I won’t be able to make the mock court case in front of Parliament. So, instead, I’ll prepare to help people comprehend their enemy through the company’s courts. So, if you’re more interested in preparing yourself to “know thy enemy,” make sure you’re up here from the 23rd to the 25th of August. You may learn the correct argument against man dates and the lawfulness of enforcement that isn’t consented to. It’s really simple: tell them that you know the safety standards, and thus, you know that implementing COVID-19 response mechanisms fail in its obligations to the hazard (SARS CoV-2). This response does not meet your obligations to the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 regarding the hazard or hypothetical symptom reduction.
The best way to defeat your enemy is to turn its own rules on itself while maintaining a lawful position. If you know the law, then you are not subject to some companies’ bad rules.