It's Just Theatre
When politics has you riled up, just remember, it's just theatre for the masses.
Once upon a time, I was in a theatre show. A theatre show staged by Moral Relativists in the Ministry of Justice with defamatory help from Mainstream Media. At the time, I did not know I was in a theatre show; at the time, I believed it was all for real. Thankfully, I had the presence of mind not to violently respond in the many ways I could have. Thankfully, I had the perception to acknowledge the camera's presence and their scope of view. I also had the presence of mind to make sure that I was the director of my own theatre, just in case someone else with more means wished to impose their unlawful theatre upon me through fraudem occultans. I had two choices: enlist the services of those who are experienced in legal theatre and learn very little, or foolishly do it myself and learn a whole lot. I chose the latter. Abraham Lincoln inferred that anyone who thinks they can represent themselves in rem jurisdiction has a fool for a client. Thankfully, I knew I was an agent for a de-frauded estate, not myself.
I was not an anti-mandate, conspiracy theory loon, or anti-vax activist. Mandates are offers, I investigate conspiracy theories I don’t make up baselesss theories, and I’m not against properly formulated immune therapy. Once upon a time, journalists did their job. Journalists would contact those they write about, honour their ideology, and ask how you identify. One journalist did that; she worked for the Northern Advocate. She asked me what I wanted to be called because our conversations and the court case revealed that I was none of the above labels. Most modern “journalists” don’t do that; they’ve been contracted into waging an information war on their own people. They define you incorrectly as a matter of strategy and then slander you through cherry-picking and context distortion. Why? Ugh, because toxic masculine types do that to us! Besides, we’re not journalists; we’re media. The world is a stage; the bad guy is determined by perception, and if we can manipulate perception, we can define the bad guy.
Before all of this nonsense, I worked for those who made people’s lives easier by making useful things. I’m back doing that now, and I couldn’t be happier. If we positively make and cultivate abundance with efficiency and respect for our diverse surroundings, we are the deflationary action in an economy. But, most importantly we give ourselves a break from the influenced insanity of the polarity war. What’s the remedy to an unaffordability crisis? The deflationary action in your local economy. Who doesn’t get that? Those who provide theatre to the masses. What else don’t they comprehend? Less have coin for your theatre if needed things aren’t affordable. Nobody will pay a theatre actor if they can’t afford to eat and travel. Who inflates the costs of those things? Intangible forces in the market. Who contributes to that? Services, irresponsible currency creation, and theatre. Market prices inflate if there are far more intangibles than tangibles in the market. What kind of theatre “service” is the worst “service” for inflation? Corporate-funded Parliament Theatre.
You know, the one that declares that there is an unaffordability crisis and Parliament theatre, the action that created that, is part of the solution.
Considering the mass emotional investment in political lunatics, you can see how inflation can be produced through influenced lunacy. Many people follow the beliefs and non-beliefs of actors, and that’s just the start of the problem with Parliament Theatre. Consider the allegation that these natural persons write law(s) and pass them in their theatre house through readings. Compound that problem with borrowing on our behalf to fund their chosen monopoly’s ideological pursuits. These pursuits almost always benefit those who rig the game the best: those pursuing the monopoly on the issuance of certain things and services. Does that sound like a fabulous theatre show to join? What’s your role? Did you know that politics and activism are just theatre? If the answer is no, you are an audience that is programmed to receive. You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.
After all, you might be a slave to the influences of said theatre. Slavery never died; it just stopped discriminating on the basis of race. Modern-day slavers prey on those who are ignorant of the law through the fraudulent mechanisms of those who “uphold laws”.
That point above is why I am writing this article today. Once upon a time, I thought the point of politics was to influence people to be the change needed in this world through the careful use of rhetoric. Imagine my shock when I learned that a politician’s job is not to:
Write law
Fund public services with taxes
Influence people to be better versions of themselves with careful use of rhetoric.
Imagine my concern when I learned that their job is not to protect people from foreign warmongering persons. Their job is to ensure they meet their corporation’s obligations to its international trading partners (foreign warmongering persons) by influencing the public to meet those obligations for them. They are debtors who encourage others to be debtors with them for “safety”. This is how it is. So, I did not put any stock into the New Zealand Loyal campaign. Why not? Because one former lawyer and a bunch of well-meaning patriots doth butter no parsnips in a seasoned snake pit. They may be excellent when it comes to media, activism and real life, but when it comes to commerce law, narrative precision, and strategic mobilization of supporting businesses, they are no match for the likes of National, ACT, and New Zealand First.
But, you protest with Hannah Spierer’s naive defensive narrative, “They could have been an effective opposition to a National, ACT, and NZ First government”. The problem with that pipe dream? The desire of the thousands of New Zealand First supporters to see their business funder in government, and the lack of support from the mask wearers and Starscream idolising, Māori worshipping white liberals. Why does that matter? That’s your target ideological market if you’re aiming to be the opposition of this government. Hence why, the largest portion of the Freedom community saw that political campaign as nothing more than a vote dividing, media funding theatre; that’s all it achieved. Could they have achieved media funds without reducing our competent voices in the Parliament theatre? Yes, they could have, and yet, they vote divided anyway.
Further down, what I will relay to you will be paywalled from here on out. Not because I want to take money from you; it’s a test of your will to learn the reality of the situation we are all in. Well-meaning politicians and activists included. I have always been an advocate for the notion that we all win when we stop bullshitting each other in the short term for the benefit of the “greater good”. We may not be as bad as those who are in power, but remember, they have power; we don’t. Could worse things happen if we seized power in our infant state? Potentially, history certainly shows that! You all need to know the nature of government so that what you plan to do about its corruption is not a waste of time and energy.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Horus Media to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.