Between A Rock And A Hard Place
When "those who wrestle with God" design a financial system that is based on fraud, they both prosper immensely and suffer immensely.
What side are you on? Free Palestine, or We Support Israel? Surely you are not that foolish, are you in the Holy Land? Are you an Israeli, or are you a Palestinian? Are you a Zionist or are you a manipulated useful idiot masquerading as a Freedom Fighter? No? Then you’re not on any side because you have the luxury of a flawed third-person perspective. The only ones who can be forgiven for being on a side are the ones who have less of a choice, those who are trapped in war. Why is there a war? One side believes they are more competent to control strategic trade routes than the other, and the other side wants their opposition purged from the land. Why is Gaza an important trade route? Because the Imperialists and the Zionists won’t rely on the Arabs to widen their Suez Canal, and manage it competently and fairly.
The Arabs hate Zionists and Imperialists, and it’s no wonder, that pair are better at expansive warfare than the Arabs. Does better imply good at honorable contestation? Hell no, two Chinese Colonels may have written Unrestricted Warfare, but no one does unrestricted warfare quite like the Zionists. Anywhere is fair game for those most competent at pursuing power, whether it be concealing frauds in economic systems, or undermining the minds of your children with subversive media. The best of the Jewish tell you themselves, we can be the best of humanity, and we can be the worst of humanity. That’s why the Arabs don’t want a Zionist government near them and why the left of the world has an uneasy relationship with ze Jews. Lack of context.
What has got the left-wing atheist Nazis engaging in contradictory anti-Jew persecution? The Zionists and the Imperialists favour a Zionist government controlling Gaza so their proposed new canal is managed by Zionist competence. Suddenly, Hamas decides to wage war on innocent people in Israel, which then gives Israel an excuse to launch into an obliterate Gaza campaign, thus, freeing up a bunch of real-estate and canal construction zones. In my opinion the victimhood and self-defense stories are all manufactured excuses. Who manufactured these narratives? Hard to say. Who manufactures smokescreen narratives to hide corporate agendas? Liberals and Conservatives who are rightly concerned about corrupt Atheistic Collectivism, but ignore their own belief-based corruption.
Now that you’ve had an insight into the marketing ability of fake compassionate types through COVID-19, you now have a sliver of insight into the Middle East problem. A contradictory Liberal state surrounded by an equally contradictory Conservative Arab population.
The above statement is not the whole story; Israel is not just a Liberal state, the clue is in the name. Isis, Ra, and El. Isis the caged mother, Ra the jealous Conservative father, and the son of the jealous father and caged mother. El, Yahweh, or Enlil; the archetype of “competence”, but also revenge favoring rage. The name of the “Jewish” state tells of an age-old story, told in multiple ways that correlate to the content of multiple cults worldwide. If you truly want to know human psychology, look at the stories we’ve been telling ourselves for thousands of years.
The conflict story above is thousands of years old and requires a level of research not practical for the too busy worker, struggling under perpetual inflation. Of which, is created by immoral currency printers, media corporations, and the corporations that build the future for humanity. The onus is on me to not designate a specific culprit in this conflict. If I won’t do my due diligence on combing through all the history of human belief-based conflict, and I don’t have extensive access to reliable real-time intel on the Middle East situation; then I don’t have any standing to blame either side for causing the war. However, if the reports show evidence of genocide, then someone in the West better say and do something substantial before the East does.
The truth is, murder is occurring, and both sides are responsible. The Israel is defending itself narrative is as weak as dried twigs and the free Palestine narrative is only as strong as the competence and clean hands of its advocates. If you advocate for technologically beneficial depopulation through pharmaceutical experimentation, then advocating against genocide is not for you. That’s called being a hypocrite. The world of media claims to know who is more responsible for this immoral economic move, and the common people just want the madness to stop. Who doesn’t want it to stop until Gaza is almost unlivable? Those who are set to acquire more territory and energy from the outcome; the greedy. Hence why we have propaganda, proxy wars, and media bullshit. How do we solve this problem? Define the problem by watching the below video.
One of our shared stories is as old as writing. It is the story of Cain and Abel. It is a significant story among the Abrahamic religions of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. Interestingly, the Roman Empire’s birth shares a similar story through the story of Romulus and Remus. As the military arm of the Roman Empire; the maintainer of the Pax Romana, has moved to the United States corporation, you can sort of see why Israel is supported by the United States corporation. They’re in the same ideological cult. Don’t agree? Ra is the God of the Christian Old Testament religion (Amen=Amun-Ra). El/Enlil/Yahweh is the God of Judaism and Islam, and Isis (Divine Femininity) is protected in the West through druidic derivatives who claim to pursue the path of righteousness. It gets more complicated when you look into what Zionism is and why it seems to be the overlooked Elephant in the room. Before we digress from an earnest attempt to explain this complicated situation, back to the Cain and Abel story.
It is my opinion that this story is not explained well enough to the general public. If it were, and more people could identify these flaws in themselves, then we could all pay more attention to its effect on interpersonal relationships. The Cain and Abel dynamic is present in most interpersonal relationship breakdowns. This most recent Zionist and Hamas conflict is a continuing spiral of tit-for-tat warfare that has gone on for millennia. The Cain and Abel dynamic is humanity’s cyclical trap, embodied in the philosophy; an eye for an eye. If you have a mind for psychology and allegorical metaphors, Cain and Abel is an incredibly old and deep story, imbued with two key messages for humanity.
Do not forsake your brother for your success, and do not envy or fear the success of your brother, lest that envy and fear drive you into a prison of your own making.
The Cain and Abel story starts by revealing the psychology of the two brothers in their professions. Cain the sedentary farmer and Abel the nomadic sheep herder. Why does this reveal the psychology of the brothers? Because of the nature of the division between the brothers; jealousy over the other’s seemingly unreasonable success. Which one’s success? The one who is nomadic and faithful in his preferred profession. On face value; Abel could be regarded as foolish in his sacrifices. Abel the sheep-herding Liberal who engages in high-quality upbeat sacrifices that please God. Meanwhile, the bitter-hard-working Cain fails to earn God’s favour through his begrudging sedentary practices. Many look to the Cain and Abel story as a metaphor for the conflict between sedentary farmers and nomadic peoples, as their two ways of life would often clash. If you go deeper, you’ll see that this story explains all interpersonal relationship problems on a psychological level. It’s no wonder this divide or unhealed trauma is common to the consensus, it’s been a part of all our lives for the entirety of our existence.
The conflict between right and left, masculine and feminine, the frugal Arab world and the State of Israel; it’s all Cain vs Abel. Back to the story, Cain toils resentfully while bearing the responsibility to the family through sedentary practices, while Abel flourishes with a positive attitude in a role that is simple provided there are no predators and plenty of food. Maybe his flock benefits from the resentful labour of his brother, maybe Abel’s success blinds him to the struggles of his brother. In any case, the story concludes with Abel being murdered by his brother Cain after being warned by “the Lord” of the need for patience and the ability to let go. Cain would not heed this warning and according to the Bible would be the ancestor of city-builders and fashioners of weapons of war. Cain would go unpunished by Old Testament God (Yahweh), and father children, and those children would go on to have more children.
His youngest brother Seth, born after the loss of Abel would father Enosh and he would father Kenan. That name would be etched into the stones of time in the land known as Canaan, pronounced Keinan. The land known today as the Holy Land may have been referred to as the land of the descendants of Cain. Redemption and remedy would be found in the nature of Cain’s younger brother Seth. A man who is neither contradictory liberal/feminine nor contradictory conservative/masculine, the best of both of his brothers, the founder of the Abrahamic philosophies that have formed the basis of our law system.
Does our law system make revenge lawful? No!
If you are a believer in the cult of Cain, you would disagree and use twisted reason to argue for something you wouldn’t wish on yourself. Conversely, if you are in the cult of Abel, you would agree. Yet, not for sophisticated psychological warfare that intends to provoke a predictable response that makes the temper-plagued brother look bad to the audience. For those wise ones who attempt to genuinely find the path to peace, genuine peace; war is given up. Unfortunately, war in all its forms is addictive. People wage war on themselves daily by taking things that will eventually kill them, it just makes them feel so good in the short term. That’s the curious thing about responses that seem so good when you consider them shallowly, they don’t deliver a long-term benefit. If it is not a long-term benefit, then it could be a long-term doom.
I watched Sean Plunket attempt to squeeze emotion out of a stone recently. I don’t say that in an attempt to criticize Sean Plunket’s personality, I don’t know the guy, but I respect the work of the man in his areas of passion. We all have our blind spots, and he has observed that play out in front of his face just as I have. In this snippet from The Platform, I was introduced to the Hamas attack footage. Because I have been an eye-witness to the nature of subversion, sophisticated gaslighting, internal infiltration, undermining, and manipulation of Freedom groups here, I am not naive to the deceitful nature of certain intelligence groups and organisations. I don’t set my default cognitive baseline to assuming that conspiracies don’t exist in government. To believe that in a society this advanced should be a psychological disorder. Those who conspire to engage in “justified” wrongs to “right” greater wrongs, secure a greater form of retardation; the pursuit of nihilism for all, rather than a more reasonable set of pursuits. Those being; moving away from that pursuit and confining self-destructive pursuits to those who are passionately nihilistic.
If Sean had asked me if I condemned them as Hamas terrorists, I would have answered. All those individuals, involved in that recorded attack, claiming allegiance to the group Hamas must be brought to justice. And if it is shown that a third-party interest manipulated that terrorist event for pecuniary gain, then they should be brought to justice too. We all get why it’s important to have a balanced state between those who value masculinity more than femininity, and those who value femininity more than masculinity. Those who believe that a war is necessary to purge corruption from the world will hope this tension enflames until “those who wrestle with God” are exiled to the desert again. Their way out? Relinquishing power in favour of wisdom, find true balance in the form of mentorship over manipulation. Get off the path of Cain and onto the path of Seth. Will they do it, or will their dogma enable the cult of Atheistic Collectivism and Technocratic Authoritarianism to obtain its excuse to invade?
Do I support Israel, or do I support Palestine? Why is that the question? Is it because stupid questions that puppet people into supporting divisive distractions are a useful way to get people to look the other way? Here’s a better question; do you support governments who purport to write the law engaging in unlawful actions made legal for some short-sighted gain? Do you support Freedom Fighters that do unlawful things to overthrow the unlawful tyrant? If the answer is yes to both, then you support tyranny on thee, but not on me, and you are not someone who should profess to know the law, or the solution to this complex repeating problem. If you are by chance a government that writes the rules and enforces them on others through warfare, then you are a very large and dangerous collection of idiots. That statement does not justify the other idiot’s cause to be the next idiot, but it does bring context to the situation without an extensive need for evidence.
In close; I will cautiously leave an opinion on this defence of the “State of Israel”. I think the danger posed by the insanity that lives in the East is something that cannot be ignored. So I get the reasons why some of my Conservative friends defend the Zionist State of Israel. However, I think waging a straw-man war on the word decolonization is a stupid move. Ben Shapiro should heed the wisdom of Candice Owens, and he should be mindful of the contradictory nature of his ego. Calls for the decolonization of Palestine do not equal genocide, that is the stupidest thing I have heard in weeks, coming from someone who should know the difference between consistency and contradiction.
Decolonization does not mean the elimination of a culture, race, or religious group, it means the elimination of the action that attempts to force out one or all of those for another. What’s that? A contradictory government. In my opinion, the Zionist state is a small, but effective instrument at contradicting itself and pissing everyone off around it. That is why the Arab world is vastly populated with individuals, groups, and revenge-filled victims who want the death of the Zionist state, and that is the reason why the Zionist state works to undermine the Arab world. A desperate survival mechanism that will eventually exile their people to the desert again.
It’s a vicious old cycle that is worthy of a story that survives time. With regard to allegorical stories imbued with lessons, the wise over time have said; never mind the messenger, did you get the message?
The last time a Western State in this particular part of the world failed it evacuated to Cyprus rather than the desert (1291).
In addition the Penteteuch came to us via the Greeks. It is a Greek work from a Greek world that was trying to reinvent itself. The attempts to raise a people who believed it seemed to be based at Qumran suitably distant from the major cities at the time, especially Alexandria & Athens. So interesting their descendants (maybe not all are) seem drawn back there as most of them would have come from all over the Greek world at the time rather than just this small sliver of land. In fact in the 7th C many of them still in that part of the world on the Southern Med, mostly Roman at the time, took on another religion, Islam. And the part of the world that has mostly been called Palestine and now Israel was in fact a hick part of the Empire (whatever Empire it was, does it matter?) and barely numbered more than a few hundred k for most of its existence. Now there's maybe 12 million there. Crazy times.