A Media Revolution

If the Media is in the way of a Revolution, start a Media Revolution.

A few years ago, I met Kelvyn Alp. A man with one hell of a story and one hell of a presence. As a Liberal, I’ve always been partial to judging a man by the content of their character, not the group they align with, whether that be their race, skin colour, or beliefs. Yet, I first wanted to know what Kelvyn Alp believed. I didn’t need to ask; either Kelvyn knew that was what I wanted to know, or Kelvyn wanted to know my inclination and decided to prompt it out of me by revealing his first. What does Kelvyn Alp believe? He believes that man should be free to do whatever they want, so long as that want does no harm, injury, or loss to another.

That is a worthy pursuit to engage with daily because it seems impossible. This philosophy would leave me in a state of distracted contemplation for weeks. How could an organism that seems to evolve by consuming other organisms do no harm, injury, or loss to others? Should we water it down like the Catholic Church watered down the sermons of Jesus Christ? As a start, should we believe that we should do no harm, injury, or loss to other people?

It’s hilarious that a group of white, privileged, slavery-loving University students think they represent the opposition to racism.

Recently, the Crown unlawfully detained Kelvyn and Hannah for allegedly sharing objectionable content. Who decides what classifies as objectionable content? Their opposition is those who wield unlawful power and authority over the masses. Seem unfair? The war against an unlawful regime is always lop-sided. Those concerned about the corruption of power do not tend to have much power against those who have a lot. That doesn’t mean you should not bother resisting, far from it. It means you should fight harder, lest authority gains more authority, and allows slavery to become popular again through its new and improved marketing.

You find most viral loading accumulated in the nasal pharynx. So, some opportunist has decided to remove the unnecessary mouth covering in this next mask instalment. But, sadly, it still doesn’t protect you from the hazard.

Kelvyn has been trying to tell people what’s coming for a long time. Unfortunately, his straight-up, no-nonsense approach creates offence towards him while delivering the ugly truth to us all. Many in the freedom movement avoid Counterspin because they’d rather provide and hear popular half-truths over ugly full-truths. VFF and Chantelle Baker avoid Counterspin like a bad smell because they aim to “wake up” the wobbly middle. Something I could never do; it’s not just wrong, it’s divisive, and it’s contrary to what we represent. If we’re for freedom and, therefore, diversity, then we will have to find a way to support each other in all our different flavours.

We’ve invited the heads of VFF onto Counterspin multiple times. Even with the attack by Police in Tikipunga and Wellington, we’ve never been invited onto VFF’s webinars to share our “courageous conversation”.

Admire Kelvyn and the rest of the working class of the Freedom movement for our insistence that we must fight to win. We’re not playing tiddlywinks to get the wobbly middle to feel sympathy for us through martyrdom theatre. Wellington had its good points, and we will forever remember Freedom Village for its positives, but we should also note down and remember the negatives to improve on them. Let’s be realistic, we’re up against the juggernaut of all juggernauts, and they don’t care about our well-being. We shouldn’t be pleading with them not to lock us away or kill us all; we should overcome them and lock them away for their crimes. If we allow victimhood theatre to dominate our strategy, we’ll end up right back where we started; under the tyranny of bad actors who sell us fake utopias while the same mindsets rule over us with an iron curtain of bullshit.

Who is the information expert? An ex-intelligence asset or a Communist potato-top pie-eating mother fucker?

So why have Kelvyn Alp and Hannah Spierer’s trust names been saddled with these charges? Is it because allegedly sharing a documentary on the Christchurch Massacre is objectionable and proves that it causes harm, injury, or loss to others? Or are they trying to slow them down by giving them some bullshit charges to defend?

Kelvyn Alp from Counterspin Media chats with Michael Laws — YouTube

It’s no secret that Kelvyn wants the negative reinforcement-based system (government) to die under the fires of revolution, and at one point in my life, I liked the idea. After likely losing my father-in-law to the jab, I briefly wanted the image of that again. Like Kelvyn, I am a mummy’s boy. However, much like I have made peace with my father, I have come to comprehend the masculine structure of government. It doesn’t need to die, but Lady Liberty’s 21st Century Constitutional binds need to constrain it adequately. Kelvyn is a massive problem for the establishment, they don’t want Constitutions denying their ability to accumulate power and assets, and Kelvyn is the most prominent advocate for one.

The trend is clear; it doesn’t matter whether it’s Labour or National; the Crown is centralising power in the hands of those who already have most of it. Labour increases the regulations for the common folk, and National drops regulations for those who can afford it.

The Corporate State’s purpose is now clear, to bring the world of people under the rule of technocratic monopoly corporations and AI-controlled lenders. The establishment is doomed if popularity grows for the morally inclined un-common intelligence. It doesn’t matter what the establishment does now, the destination is locked in, and it’s only a matter of time. There will be a Great Reset, but it will not favour the elite; the first domino has fallen, and the rest will fall in time. We can thank Counterspin for starting our media revolution that will spark a new course that constrains the slavers for another 300 years.